Of all the actions, directives, executive orders Donald Trump has promulgated during his first six days in office, perhaps the cruelest and most inhumane one has been the order “Realigning the United States Refugee Admissions Program.” The order, according to The New York Times, “suspended a resettlement program that brings thousands of legal refugees to the country each year.” It closed a legal route to the safety of America from the ravages of conflict and oppression in distant lands.
Most telling in its cruelty and execution is its restriction on Afghanis who risked their lives to aid and assist America and its soldiers during our long war against the Taliban. We owe it to them to save them from the vengeance the Taliban seeks to inflict on them and their families.
Many have filled out forms, been vetted, investigated and waited for years, often hiding from the Taliban, to secure a flight to America. All their hopes have been dashed by Trump’s cruel and inhumane obsession with painting all who want to come here as burdensome immigrants who would tax our systems, take our jobs, rob and rape us and even kill us ( https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/25/world/asia/trump-executive-order-immigration-afghanistan.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare).
I cannot vouch for its authenticity, nor authorship, but the following defense of Episcopal Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde to the verbal attack unleashed by Donald Trump is a well-written response, purported to be from the Episcopal Church of Washington (I have my doubts) as disseminated by something called Washington Press:
“This is what the Episcopalian Church had to say about his tantrum on X:
“President Trump,
“1. Much like those who do not want you to be president, you do not get to decide whether a bishop’s office is legitimate. She was chosen by the people of her diocese to be their bishop. Then, she was granted consent to be a bishop by other bishops and standing committees of our church’s dioceses. Beginning by calling her a “so-called” bishop is an obvious low blow to discredit her as a person, rather than what she actually said that you disagree with. The Episcopal Church was legitimate enough to hold your third wedding, the funeral of Melania’s mother, and the baptism of your son, Barron. Barron also attended an Episcopal day school. Now you have an issue with how we do things when it doesn’t go your way?
“2. You didn’t have an issue with politics being brought into the church by the ministers who spoke at your inauguration, or by yourself for that matter. They were blatantly partisan, crediting God for your political success: ‘Mr. President, the last four years there were times I’m sure you thought it was pretty dark, but look what God has done,’ (Reverend Franklin) Graham said.
“3. She wasn’t nasty in tone, plain and simple. I can’t remember ever hearing a homily given in such a gracious manner and calm tone. If you disagree, listen to her speak. You may disagree with what she said, but her tone was in no way “nasty.” Additionally, insulting her intelligence, rather than quoting what you disagreed with, is a very typical play coming from a narcissist.
“4. The vast majority of people who have committed crimes in the U.S. are U.S. citizens. Defending yourself about being asked to have mercy on immigrants by saying a ‘large number of illegal migrants came into our country and killed people’ is a gross misrepresentation and does not make sense. By that logic, we should be locking up or deporting all Americans because the majority of crimes were committed by citizens. We do need to improve our immigration system, but scripture commands us as Christians to have mercy. Mercy is a central tenet of our faith. Matthew 5:7 says, ‘Blessed are the merciful, for they will be shown mercy.’ Leviticus 19: 33-34 says, ‘When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God.’ If you have take issue with this, take it up with God.
“5. Saying the service was boring and uninspiring is a move to discredit the event, rather than what specifically was said. However, it’s worth mentioning that the purpose of a service is not to be ‘exciting.’ There are several purposes for our services, such as honoring God, bringing us closer to God, and being in community with one another. Being ‘exciting’ is not one of them. As far as inspiration goes, that is in the eye of the beholder. You get as much out of it as you put into it.
“6. The bishop does not owe you an apology. Our church does not owe you an apology. All you were asked to do is what scripture directly asks us to do. If you could quote one thing she asked of you that isn’t asked of us in scripture, we would apologize. Someone recently reminded me of something I often heard growing up in church. If you are offended by a minister’s sermon or feel that it was a personal attack, look to see if you can find anything they said that was out of line with scripture and the teachings of Jesus. If you can’t, that feeling is what we call, ‘being convicted of your sin.’ The fact you are so offended by what was said shows you know there is truth in it. To your supporters who also feel offended by it, the same goes.”